Does ‘Tomb Raider’ Have a Post-Credits Scene?



Warner Bros./MGM

“Tomb Raider” looks to be one of the few good video game-to-film adaptations out there. Part of doing that means rebooting the past two movie iterations of the popular game series that previously starred Angelina Jolie to kick off a new franchise.
This version of “Tomb Raider,” starring Alicia Vikander, takes its story from the 2013 game of the same name. That game also looked to restart the franchise, refocusing on a version of protagonist Lara Croft that was more a self-sufficient survivor than a busty piece of eye candy. The game largely succeeded in that attempt, with a sequel released in 2015 and another being teased by publisher Square Enix.
Director Roar Uthaug’s take on that story, in which a shipwrecked Lara fights off bad guys on a strange island off Japan using mostly her wits and her archery skills, is also looking to spawn sequels. The movie sets up future stories in line with those of the games. In the age of cinematic universes, the possibility of a sequel often means teaser scenes that pop up after the credits have rolled. So do you need to stay in your seat after the conclusion of Lara Croft’s story?
Also Read:
The answer is yes, but you won’t have to wait as long as you might fear to hit the bathroom. “Tomb Raider” has a short mid-credits scene that pops up after the theatrical credits, but before the longer and more extensive credits sequence. The scene doesn’t so much as set up a future storyline — instead, it pays a little service to longtime “Tomb Raider” fans.
(Spoilers for the scene from here on out!)
The mid-credits scene in “Tomb Raider” occurs back in London, where Lara lived before she set out on her adventure. During the movie, she visited a pawn shop where the owner, Max (an always hilarious Nick Frost), haggled with Lara over a pendant she sold to get the money she needed for her trip. At the end of the movie, Lara returns to get back what’s hers.
Also Read:
After her experiences on the island of Yamatai, however, Lara has changed significantly — and she’s also claimed the Croft fortune. She buys back her pendant, and then asks the pawn shop’s owners for something more. They show her their stock of guns, which Lara looks through in earnest.
Eventually, Lara picks two big pistols, referencing her traditional dual-pistol approach in the original video game series. It’s a fun nod for “Tomb Raider” fans, and after everything audiences learn in the movie about the evil organization known as Trinity, it suggests that Lara’s going to take the fight to her enemies.

Video game movies have a bad reputation because, honestly, there are very few that we’d call actually “good.” At their best, at least so far, these big-screen adaptations have been fun and trashy entertainment. At their worst, they’re among the worst movies ever made. 
So let’s rank ’em!

41. “Postal” (2008)The pinnacle of director Uwe Boll’s string of horrendous video game movies (he has five that qualify for this list by getting theatrical releases somewhere), but to be fair it’s probably still a better work of art than the game it’s based on.
Vivendi

40. “Alone in the Dark” (2005)”House of the Dead” briefly tricked us into thinking Uwe Boll was a camp master, but his next video game movie, “Alone in the Dark,” was such an incomprehensible slog that I have never been able to sit all the way through it after my first viewing in the theater.
Lionsgate

39. “The Wizard” (1989)Technically this is an adaptation of a novelty video game peripheral, the Nintendo Power Glove, rather than an actual game. And it’s as much of a joke as you’d expect a feature-length ad to be.
Universal

38. “The Angry Birds Movie” (2016)I’m a negative person on principle, but even I was put off by the misanthropy of this kids movie. When neo-Nazis embrace your cartoon, you probably did something wrong.
Sony/Columbia

37. “BloodRayne” (2006)In 2003, Kristanna Loken looked like she was gonna be somebody when she starred as a Terminatrix in “Terminator 3.” And then she starred in two Uwe Boll movies, including this travesty.
Romar Entertainment

36. “Silent Hill: Revelations” (2012)Worse than the first “Silent Hill” movie in every possible way, down to actors who seem incapable of making facial expressions. Which is bad news, because most of the acting in a “Silent Hill” movie demands involves reacting to all the weird things the characters encounter.
Open Road

35. “Pokemon Heroes” (2003)This is the fifth “Pokemon” movie. That’s all I have to say about it.
Miramax

34. “Max Payne” (2008)Most videos games aren’t really suited for film adaptations, but “Max Payne” is an exception as violent melodramatic noir. To its credit, the movie version goes for that, but ultimately it’s just not very good.
20th Century Fox

33. “Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li” (2009)Usually, bad video game movies are the “boring” kind of bad, but the second attempt at a “Street Fighter” movie almost manages to achieve “accidental camp classic” status at some points. But the rest of it, unfortunately, is just an affront to humanity. 
20th Century Fox

32. “Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within” (2001)Exactly the sort of half-baked melodramatic garbage you’d expect from the awful “Final Fantasy” series.
Columbia

31. “Pokemon 4Ever” (2002)This one has time travel, I think? Look, don’t worry about the plot.
Miramax

30. “Need for Speed” (2014)A story-less racing game franchise like “Need for Speed” should be the easiest kind of game to adapt, because there’s actually nothing to adapt. So all you have to do is make a cool car-based action movie. But this movie can’t even get that right.
Touchstone

29. “Pokemon: The Movie 2000: The Power of One” (2000)I always have trouble remembering which “Pokemon” movie is which, and this one’s distracting double colons in the title doesn’t help.
Warner Bros

28. “Tomb Raider: Cradle of Life” (2003)The follow-up to a pretty OK first movie that felt rushed, “Cradle” basically just tried to copy the first movie but with a lower budget. That’s a very video game approach to take, but not a good result.
Paramount

27. “Mortal Kombat: Annihilation” (1997)Feels like a cheap knock-off of the first “Mortal Kombat” rather than an actual sequel.
New Line

26. “Hitman” (2007)Was this even really a movie? It’s hard to tell, honestly, considering it felt like half its plot was left on the cutting-room floor.
20th Century Fox

25. “Wing Commander” (1999)Remember that brief moment when Hollywood wanted to make Freddie Prinze Jr. into a thing? Ironically, he’s been pretty good acting in actual video games lately.
20th Century Fox

24. “Double Dragon” (1994)I’m sure someone out there has strong feelings about the “Double Dragon” movie, but I definitely do not. But hey, Scott Wolf.
Gramercy

23. “House of the Dead” (2003)Of all the Uwe Boll movies on this list, “House of the Dead” is the most watchable because it manages just the right balance of filmmaking ineptitude and inexplicable-yet-funny creative flourishes. In this case, the random splicing of clips from the “House of the Dead” gameplay between shots.
Artisan Entertainment

22. “Warcraft” (2016)”It’s like ‘Lord of the Rings’ if there weren’t any Hobbits to explain everything to,” my friend told me after we watched it. Sounds about right, considering its barrage of nonsense fantasy concepts that it just assumes the audience already understands.
Universal

21. “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time” (2010)It’s not good, but has Hollywood cred because it’s bad in the way that many attempts at summer blockbusters are bad. The video game connection feels incidental, though.
Disney

20. “Pokemon 3: The Movie” (2001)This is the one where a girl gets a Pokemon to be her dad after her real dad disappears. So it’s one of the better ones.
Warner Bros

19. “In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale” (2008)Jason Statham, Ray Liotta, Ron Perlman, Burt Reynolds, Matthew Lillard, Leelee Sobieski, John Rhys-Davies. Probably the most amusing fantasy cast you could imagine, turning an Uwe Boll nightmare into something that’s extremely watchable ironically. Watchability goes a long way on a list like this where most of the movies are terrible.
Freestyle Releasing

18. “Ratchet & Clank” (2016)We finally got to see what it would look like if you took a bunch of random cinematic scenes out of a game and cut them into a movie. And surprisingly, it’s not that bad!
Focus Features

17. “Tekken” (2010)A perfectly OK movie about people beating the crap out of each other, to match a perfectly OK video game series about people beating the crap out of each other.
Anchor Bay

16. “Assassin’s Creed” (2016)
This is a movie that won’t make a lick of sense if you haven’t played one or two of the games it’s based on. But I have played all of the games, and I found it to be a reasonably entertaining action flick. It’s definitely pretty dumb, though.

15. “Resident Evil: Extinction” (2007)This one has zombie birds. I can’t imagine why anybody would dislike that.
Screen Gems

14. “Resident Evil” (2002)Fans of the game series don’t like this movie because it doesn’t follow the same plot as the source material. But honestly, this movie has a better story than any of the games. And it’s one of the better modern zombie movies.
Screen Gems

13. “DOA: Dead or Alive” (2007)One of the rare examples of a live-action video game movie fully embraces its source material. Sure, that source material is trashy and exploitative, but it always came with a wink. This movie comes with about a thousand winks. 
Dimension

12. “Pokemon: The First Movie” (1999)There’s no such thing as a good “Pokemon” movie, but there is such a thing as a “Pokemon” movie that might make you cry. This is that “Pokemon” movie.
Warner Bros

11. “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” (2001)Thus far, this is the mainstream ideal for what a video game movie could be: a fun, light action flick that operates as a real movie. It’s perfectly enjoyable.
Paramount

10. “Hitman: Agent 47” (2015)As an adaptation of a stealthy game series it’s just OK, but as an inventive R-rated action movie it’s actually really enjoyable.
20th Century Fox

9. “Resident Evil: Apocalypse” (2004)The second “Resident Evil” is where the film series found its true identity as delightful trash action pictures rather than horror films. It was a good move.
Screen Gems

8. “Doom” (2005)When it comes to horror sci-fi action, you could do worse than having The Rock as the bad guy who goes psycho at the end.
Universal

7. “Super Mario Bros.” (1993)Everybody hates this movie, but I’m not sure there’s any other way to adapt the “Mario” games than with a dumb comedy like this. Those games don’t exactly have normal story elements like “dialogue” or “themes.” Anyway, this film works on sheer novelty value alone today.
Disney

6. “Street Fighter” (1994)It’s “Batman: The Movie” meets “Rambo,” and somehow it actually works.
Universal

5. “Resident Evil: The Final Chapter” (2017)
Paul W.S. Anderson caps off the “Resident Evil” series by throwing out any and all worries about continuity. Iain Glenn is back from the third movie for a chance to be super ridiculously evil again, and we finally get a reason for this zombie apocalypse. “The Final Chapter” more awesome monster-beat downs and more horrific deaths.
Screen Gems

4. “Silent Hill” (2006)One thing video games have going for them above other media is visual inventiveness — if nothing else, they usually look cool. “Silent Hill” manages to tap into that, while also being a pretty decent movie otherwise.
Tri-Star

3. “Mortal Kombat” (1995)The ’90s were a bad stretch for movies overall, with seemingly every other film being a bad action movie or a bad supernatural thriller. “Mortal Kombat” feels very much like a product of that sort of time, but thankfully it knows exactly what kind of trash it is.
New Line

2. “Resident Evil: Afterlife” (2010)Paul W.S. Anderson directed the first “Resident Evil,” then left the director’s chair to someone else — until he returned for “Afterlife.” There’s a marked leap in technical wizardry with this one, turning the franchise from B-level afterthought to B-level greatness.
Screen Gems

1. “Resident Evil: Retribution” (2012)It’s goofy, gory, excessive action shot absolutely impeccably. A trash masterpiece, and easy choice for the best video game movie ever.
Screen Gems

1 of 42

There have a been a lot of bad video game movies — and a handful of gems. Where does the sixth and final “Resident Evil” film land?

Video game movies have a bad reputation because, honestly, there are very few that we’d call actually “good.” At their best, at least so far, these big-screen adaptations have been fun and trashy entertainment. At their worst, they’re among the worst movies ever made. 
So let’s rank ’em!

[ comments ]